Both are text-based resume builders for technical users. Markdown vs LaTeX — which approach is better for your resume in 2026?
| Feature | ResumeMD | Overleaf |
|---|---|---|
| Free PDF Export | ||
| No Account Required | ||
| Learning Curve | Low (Markdown) | High (LaTeX) |
| ATS-Friendly Output | ||
| Number of Templates | 32 | 100+ (community) |
| Real-Time Preview | ||
| AI Job Tailoring | ||
| AI Content Suggestions | ||
| Typographic Quality | Good | Excellent |
| Multi-Format Export | PDF, DOCX, HTML, TXT | PDF only |
| Works with AI Output | Native (Markdown) | Manual conversion |
| Mathematical Typesetting | ||
| Privacy (Local-First) | ||
| Collaboration | ||
| Resume Analytics | ||
| Time to First Resume | ~2 minutes | ~30 minutes |
| Best For | All professionals, AI workflows | Academia, typesetting enthusiasts |
ResumeMD: If you can write a README, you can write a resume. Markdown takes 5 minutes to learn. Paste content, pick a template, download. Under 2 minutes from start to PDF.
Overleaf: LaTeX has a steep learning curve. Even experienced developers spend time debugging compilation errors, package conflicts, and formatting commands. Your first LaTeX resume can take hours.
Bottom line: ResumeMD gets you a polished resume 10x faster. Overleaf is powerful but demands significant time investment.
ResumeMD: AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini output Markdown natively. Paste AI-generated content directly — it's instantly formatted. Built-in AI job tailoring analyzes job descriptions and optimizes your resume.
Overleaf: AI tools don't output LaTeX well. You'll need to manually convert AI suggestions into LaTeX commands, escaping special characters and applying formatting. No built-in AI features.
Bottom line: In the AI era, Markdown is the natural format. LaTeX adds friction to AI-assisted workflows.
Overleaf: LaTeX is the gold standard for typesetting. Kerning, ligatures, hyphenation, and micro-typography are unmatched. If you care about typographic perfection, nothing beats LaTeX.
ResumeMD: Professional-quality PDF output with good typography. Not LaTeX-level precision, but more than sufficient for resumes. Most recruiters won't notice the difference.
Bottom line: For academic CVs and typesetting enthusiasts, Overleaf is superior. For job applications, ResumeMD's output is equally effective.
ResumeMD: All 32 templates are specifically designed for ATS parsing. Clean heading hierarchy, standard section names, proper text extraction.
Overleaf: LaTeX PDFs can have text extraction issues depending on the template and packages used. Some LaTeX resume templates produce PDFs where text doesn't copy correctly, which confuses ATS parsers.
Bottom line: ResumeMD is safer for ATS. LaTeX requires careful template selection to ensure proper text extraction.
If your LaTeX resume works well and you're comfortable maintaining it, there's no urgent need to switch. But if you want faster updates, AI integration, or DOCX export, ResumeMD saves significant time.
Absolutely. Markdown handles all standard resume elements: headings, lists, bold/italic text, links, and tables. Combined with ResumeMD's 32 templates, the output is indistinguishable from LaTeX for most hiring managers.
Not directly, but converting LaTeX to Markdown is straightforward — especially with AI tools. Paste your LaTeX into ChatGPT and ask it to convert to Markdown, then paste into ResumeMD.
For academic CVs with publications, citations, and mathematical notation, Overleaf is still the better choice. For industry resumes — even in technical roles — ResumeMD is faster and more practical.
We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Privacy Policy